Skip to main content
COVID-19 information and screening Learn how we’re keeping our campus community safe, healthy and engaged during our gradual return to campus.
Note: The university’s mandatory vaccine directive is now in effect. Learn more about vaccine requirements.
Ontario Tech acknowledges the lands and people of the Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation.

We are thankful to be welcome on these lands in friendship. The lands we are situated on are covered by the Williams Treaties and are the traditional territory of the Mississaugas, a branch of the greater Anishinaabeg Nation, including Algonquin, Ojibway, Odawa and Pottawatomi. These lands remain home to many Indigenous nations and peoples.

We acknowledge this land out of respect for the Indigenous nations who have cared for Turtle Island, also called North America, from before the arrival of settler peoples until this day. Most importantly, we acknowledge that the history of these lands has been tainted by poor treatment and a lack of friendship with the First Nations who call them home.

This history is something we are all affected by because we are all treaty people in Canada. We all have a shared history to reflect on, and each of us is affected by this history in different ways. Our past defines our present, but if we move forward as friends and allies, then it does not have to define our future.

Learn more about Indigenous Education and Cultural Services

On Institutional Violence

C. Tess Sheldon, Lawyer and Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto

Published April 20, 2018 by Technologies of Justice.

During the Technologies of Justice Conference session on violent custodial logics, C. Tess Sheldon holds a talk on institutional violence. The conference took place from January 26 to 27, 2018 at the University of Ontario Institute of Technology.

 

 

Sheldon discusses law, institutional violence and disability. She places a focus on disability getting martialled, used and deployed in terms of institutional violence. She points out how biomedical power is being and has been used against people and how it is important to enact a trauma-informed practice in the legal system. She highlights how persons with disabilities are more likely to be survivors of violence, while pointing out the fact that current stats are very low because of the high barriers to reporting as a person with a disability.

She discusses how violence by direct action and failure to act are both considered types of violence that are common in places of disability, and how the use of violent techniques often appear in disability settings within institutions such as hospitals or jails. She also brings to light the focus on the victim and not the perpetrator of violence in recommendations after a case has been reported, and how there have been cases of coercive and intrusive protections through the law of people with disabilities, which have not been rectified in the way the legal system deals with cases such as theirs. She also shows the connection between disability and trauma can cause other types of confusing and disparaging situations for those who have had trauma but do not seem disabled by it, and those with a disability not caused by any sort of trauma.